X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 20:42:48 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-3656799@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <kkellner1@new.rr.com>
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14)
  with ESMTP id 3656055 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 May 2009 10:13:13 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.122; envelope-from=kkellner1@new.rr.com
Received: from D4SSJS91 ([65.27.68.13]) by hrndva-omta01.mail.rr.com
          with ESMTP
          id <20090528141234597.HDRG15535@hrndva-omta01.mail.rr.com>;
          Thu, 28 May 2009 14:12:34 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <8AF4C8C77914445895C6F3D36C5C99E5@D4SSJS91>
From: "Ken" <kkellner1@new.rr.com>
X-Original-To: <lml@lancaironline.net>,
	"Ron Galbraith" <cfi@instructor.net>
References: <redirect-3655562@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] IV wingroot gap seals
X-Original-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:12:34 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579

Ron,

Thanks for the tip. What is the safety issue??

Ken

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Galbraith" <cfi@instructor.net>
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [LML] IV wingroot gap seals


> Either rtv or teflon tape.   Acs has the tape.   Very important safety  
> issue to seal the wing gaps.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 27, 2009, at 4:30 PM, "Ken" <kkellner1@new.rr.com> wrote:
> 
>> Any recommendations for wingroot gap seals for the IV???
>