X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:42:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.210] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTP id 3590092 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:03:03 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.210; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (imo-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.136]) by imr-m08.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN1-249ec90113c9; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:09:05 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id q.bf1.4fd4ea2b (37116) for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:08:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-mb03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-mb03.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.150]) by cia-ma01.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMA012-5c6b49ec8ff83a4; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:08:47 -0400 Received: from WEBMAIL-MY35 (webmail-my35.sim.aol.com [64.12.109.23]) by smtprly-mb03.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMB031-5c6b49ec8ff83a4; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:08:40 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: In the News today X-Original-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:08:40 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 64.12.78.136 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CB8FE105BA30B3_1468_41E_WEBMAIL-MY35.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 42559-STANDARD Received: from 75.49.226.174 by WEBMAIL-MY35.sysops.aol.com (64.12.109.23) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:08:40 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CB8FE105B56C09-1468-207@WEBMAIL-MY35.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO ----------MB_8CB8FE105BA30B3_1468_41E_WEBMAIL-MY35.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" what accident is this in reference to? -----Original Message----- From: Keith Smith To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 6:44 pm Subject: [LML] Re: In the News today This is truly heart-breaking. We hear time and time again of accidents that are ultimately caused by pilot error, and while every loss is a tragedy, there is some comfort in knowing that there are things we can do as pilots to avoid those situations happening to us. We have, at least, some measure of control over our fate.? Many is the time I have told my wife, in reference to flying the 172, "listen, if the wings off these planes routinely came off in flight, then I would probably not fly, but they simply don't do that.? Planes are typically lost due to accidents that are ultimately avoidable."? That's what makes the report so painful to read. These people literally had no chance...and did nothing wrong. Keith ----------MB_8CB8FE105BA30B3_1468_41E_WEBMAIL-MY35.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" what accident is this in reference to?


-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Smith <keith.smith@gmail.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 6:44 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: In the News today

This is truly heart-breaking. We hear time and time again of accidents that are ultimately caused by pilot error, and while every loss is a tragedy, there is some comfort in knowing that there are things we can do as pilots to avoid those situations happening to us. We have, at least, some measure of control over our fate.  Many is the time I have told my wife, in reference to flying the 172, "listen, if the wings off these planes routinely came off in flight, then I would probably not fly, but they simply don't do that.  Planes are typically lost due to accidents that are ultimately avoidable." 

That's what makes the report so painful to read. These people literally had no chance...and did nothing wrong.

Keith

----------MB_8CB8FE105BA30B3_1468_41E_WEBMAIL-MY35.sysops.aol.com--