|
Uh, Lorn please note that he hit the boids at about 3000 MSL in class
B airspace (7000/GND). There should not have been any
aircraft there that wasn't in touch with ATC and subject to separation.
Oh, there was no mention of his TCAS urging any particular maneuver
(drat - birds don't have transponders) and when did TAWS start singing.
However, as he descended in line with the Hudson river and once he was
below 1100 MSL, he was out of class B and was required to look out the
window - here he should have contacted the Coast Guard to get the tugs, canoes
and ferries out of his way. It was nice that he skipped over that
bridge in his path. Anyway, I think you have to be in contact
with ATC as you motor up the Hudson these days because of a bad U-turn by a
Cirrus a few years ago. Besides his skill, there were a host of good
things that happened after the bird bash-N-hash.
I stopped flying VFR over the Eisenhower Expressway (between ORD and
MDW to the lake) once I sold the Skymaster (2 Continental engines, different
SMOHs). There is no place to land in the city when your single engine
stops and you are between 1900 MSL and 1000 AGL (about 1700 MSL). Besides
that, Da Mayor has erected pointy tipped iron fences all over the city.
Grayhawk
In a message dated 1/18/2009 9:35:49 A.M. Central Standard Time,
lorn@dynacomm.us writes:
Matt,
The controller is not responsible for separating IFR
aircraft from VFR aircraft, only other IFR aircraft. It is still the
IFR pilots responsibility to avoid hitting anything that he can
possibly see including VFR aircraft, birds and anything else that is
up in the air.
Lorn
> From: Matt Reeves
<mattreeves@yahoo.com> > Date: January 16, 2009 10:41:25 AM
GMT-05:00 > > Opinion by Matt Reeves: > > FLOCKS OF
GEESE FLY SLOW and usually in a "V" shape, AND ARE EASY TO > SEE
ON A BLUE SKY DAY - AND ARE sometimes DETECTABLE ON RADAR both >
on airplanes and on the ground. Pilots WERE heros once plane
hit > the flock, but COULD have the collision with geese been
avoided and > the answer may be YES. > > It is
possible that NEITHER pilot was looking straight out the > window
because the airplane was on aninstrument flight plan = > meaning,
controllers on the ground were responsible for aircraft >
separation. > . > . > This aircraft was on an IFR flight
plan meaning looking out the > window was not required by the
pilots since the controllers on the > ground were responsible for
separating aircraft. However, at low > altitude, at
geeseflight levels, looking out the window should be >
mandatory. Most geese do not fly in clouds. > . > . >
Matt -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm,
Inst DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us LNC2,
FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,515 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan
-- For
archives and unsub
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
|
|