X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:01 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.11) with ESMTP id 3425552 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:43:06 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.44.28; envelope-from=mdpilot982@gmail.com Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so267737yxj.7 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:42:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:importance:in-reply-to :x-mimeole; b=capexqxieOde9ftLC7t0IwsFWwcfViipKEqu2UOOvL7i20Chl7XK4aatzA+2w8piAV lw3X8BAUnvl0+sIIStn3cUJ7wlT+nnSTxUFWR3SO6SwDe6hy1PBV135etV5OdFRZCvCA Ieh2D/FCjrhfu4k5oy5UqmHp5GKVKL2uONmTk= Received: by 10.64.183.1 with SMTP id g1mr80403qbf.26.1231944149390; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:42:29 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from cssmd (c-75-72-249-193.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [75.72.249.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k27sm48490637qba.2.2009.01.14.06.42.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:42:28 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael Smith" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: tug for a legacy X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:42:34 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01C97624.0CA59C10" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C97624.0CA59C10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would be worried about using anything that I couldn't override right = on the spot (stiuck relay, crosstalk from another control, etc.) - a run = away winch would pull your beautiful airplane right through the wall before = you got to say "@#$%^" I have one in my hanger but never use it for that reason. =20 =20 I did find this gizmo which I suppose you could use if you didn't need = to reverse direction =20 =20 http://www.amazon.com/SVAT-WRC100-Wireless-Indoor-Control/dp/B000HASE9C/r= ef=3D sr_1_3?ie=3DUTF8&s=3Dphoto&qid=3D1231805879&sr=3D1-3 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Robert Pastusek =20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:38 PM Subject: [LML] Re: tug for a legacy =20 Colyn wrote: do you have a source for a 120V winch like that. I was just looking = the other day. found some 12v with the pull-cable remote but no 120v. =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C97624.0CA59C10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I would be worried about using = anything that I couldn’t override right on the spot (stiuck relay, = crosstalk from another control, etc.) - a run away winch would pull your beautiful = airplane right through the wall before you got to say “@#$%^”  I = have one in my hanger but never use it for that reason.

 

 

I did find this gizmo which = I suppose you could use if you didn't need to reverse = direction

 

----- Original Message = -----

To:<= /font> lml@lancaironline.net

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:38 PM

Subject: [LML] Re: tug for a legacy

 

Colyn wrote:

    do you = have a source for a 120V winch like that.  I was just looking the other day.  found some 12v with the pull-cable remote but no = 120v.

 

  

------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C97624.0CA59C10--