X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:07:44 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from cgpro2.tulsaconnect.com ([65.38.1.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.11) with ESMTP id 3414053 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:31:18 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.38.1.5; envelope-from=kent@tulsaconnect.com Received: from [65.38.9.183] (HELO base4d11d9f2da) by cgpro2.tulsaconnect.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.1) with SMTP id 7756312 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:30:41 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <5B8E11F674834BC38214EC4CAC256596@base4d11d9f2da> From: "Kent" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] FW: [LML] Re: No more exhaust streaks! X-Original-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:30:39 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_04A0_01C97046.05312BE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_04A0_01C97046.05312BE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good thinking.. but did it work? ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Fred Moreno=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 8:22 PM Subject: [LML] FW: [LML] Re: No more exhaust streaks! Very interesting. Just curious to why you didn't use stainless steel = instead of aluminum. John Herminghaus Good question John. There were two reasons. 1) Remember I was on = Revision 7b, and at point I put a premium on quick and easy fabrication = to test ideas. Much trial and error.2) Most important, there was a = bit of aluminum in the hangar, but no stainless. If the aluminum does = not last well, I will head to the stainless fabricator in town for = revision 7c. Fred -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com=20 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1855 - Release Date: = 12/18/2008 10:16 AM ------=_NextPart_000_04A0_01C97046.05312BE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Good  thinking..
but did it work?
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Fred Moreno
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 = 8:22=20 PM
Subject: [LML] FW: [LML] Re: No = more=20 exhaust streaks!

 

Very interesting.  Just curious to why you didn't use =
stainless steel instead of aluminum.



John Herminghaus



Good question John.  =
There were two reasons. 
 
1)     Remember I was on Revision 7b, =
and at point I put a premium on quick and easy fabrication to test =
ideas.  Much trial and error.
2)     Most important, there was a bit =
of aluminum in the hangar, but no stainless.  If the aluminum does =
not last well, I will head to the stainless fabricator in town for =
revision 7c. 
 
Fred


Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - = http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: = 270.9.19/1855 -=20 Release Date: 12/18/2008 10:16 AM
------=_NextPart_000_04A0_01C97046.05312BE0--