Well put. Thanks.
Douglas W. Johnson, MD PA
8265 Riding Club Road
Jacksonville, FL 32256
(904) 642-6016 phone
(904) 202-7020 fax
Lancair1@bellsouth.net
www.frogdocs.com
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of n427jb@bellsouth.net
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:42 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Insurance
There
were several issues presented today that require my additional comments on the
insurance/training issue. AIG cannot possibly demand that each and every
one of those aircraft inspected by Lancair need to be reinspected. Now,
keep in mind that in my last post I stated that if the aircraft has been sold
then a re-inspection would be required. Further, while I greatly respect
Jeff Edwards' enthusiasm for this subject, I do disagree with certain of his
assessments. Tim Wilson's day job has become essentially one totally
devoted to scheduling inspections. When and if Lancair inspections become
too numerous for Tim to handle, you can be assured Lancair will expand the
number of inspectors to handle the demand. While the cost for such an
inspection can be "significant," what is the value to the owner of
finding a potentially devastating flaw and thereby preventing property
damage and personal injury?
Now
on to the issue of instruction. No doubt, Jeff is a knowledgable source
who has cited statistics which should assist the insurance industry and the FAA
in determining what is the root cause of accidents. What neither Jeff nor
Pete can do is look into the mind of the pilot at any time much less at a time
immediately prior to or during any flight. They cannot be there when the
pilot decides that he or she will disregard the requirements of Part 91
regarding a current BFR, instrument approach currency, night or day landing
requirements, or even a current medical. The pilot is the problem and the
pilot needs to be trained and reminded of the hazards of flight. That
pilot needs to know that it is the initial go-no go decision that is the most
important decision he can make for the entire flight. It is through
repetative training that this issue is driven home! Now, what Jeff and
Pete must do is find a way to effectively communicate. This issue is
bigger than the both of them. In their communications, they must come up
with a common syllabus and a common check list with which to teach and
from which to report on those items taught during the training. This
common check list, when completed and delivered to Lancair, will be the basis
for the issuance of the insurance inspection form. I invite Jeff to
coordinate his efforts with Pete before setting a date for a meeting of any
kind wherein he wishes Pete to participate.
Finally,
please do not assume that Lancair is working with AIG because it is
insured with AIG. That is not the case. I have spoken with Starr
Insurance, now managed by Jim Anderson, who refuses to insure Lancairs due to
its loss history. I have not sought out other insurance companies but, as
I reported in my last post, I did hear that Avemco was starting to insure Lancair
aircraft. I would ask that all report here on the LML our experiences
with other insurance companies. You want insurance at reasonable
rates? Start training now and fly like you have been trained.
This
is not a personality contest...its not "I like Pete" or "I like
Jeff." Its all about getting a common training syllabus and a common
check list which Lancair can endorse and use as a standard from which to issue
an insurance certificate.
No virus
found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1854 - Release Date: 12/25/2008
9:40 AM