X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:15:58 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTP id 3326331 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:44:49 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.63; envelope-from=rpharis@teamimc.com Received: from [71.116.122.253] (helo=ws1) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1L7Ofd-0001AO-3a for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:23:41 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Rod Pharis" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Hysol 9339 and Auto Fuel X-Original-Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 22:22:14 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c95446$51db24d0$2101a8c0@ws1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C95403.43BA2EC0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 X-ELNK-Trace: 1293b74446918d85d780f4a490ca6956abb457f1b4332f520ffc2b6d49a5077baba9deb2fcf8266e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.122.253 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C95403.43BA2EC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Check with a Hysol Application Engineer first, and ask for fuel compatibility documentation! How (e.g., scale of 1 to 10, 10 being best) does Hysol adhesive #????? compatibility with federal standard 100LL aviation gasoline compare with 92 unleaded automobile gasoline; and alcohol additive octane booster and other local California boutique anti-smog winter blends, etc.? Rod -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Jeremy Fisher Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 4:51 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Hysol 9339 and Auto Fuel I am looking for ideas as to how I could ensure that my 360 wings will be compatible with Auto gas. The wings are finished as standard using Hysol adhesive. My engine has been built to be fully compatible with auto gas, as are the other fuel system components. I would like the option to use auto gas at times, partly because of concerns about future 100LL availability, and partly for cost reasons for the future. I understand that there are some concerns that auto gas can affect Hysol over time, and want to seal the exposed adhesive seam in the wing tanks. Sloshing sealers have a bad reputation, plus there are multiple types out there, and I do not understand all the pros and cons. I was thinking of trying to thin Jeffco tank sealant, then introduce it into the tank through flexible clear hose, and tilt the tank to run it along the seams. Does anyone have a better idea? Am I right to be concerned about compatibility with the Hysol for occasional or regular use? Any non-flaming ideas would be welcome. Thanks. Jerry Fisher ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C95403.43BA2EC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Check=20 with a Hysol Application Engineer first, and ask for fuel = compatibility=20 documentation! How (e.g., scale of 1 to 10, 10 being = best) does=20 Hysol adhesive #????? compatibility with federal standard = 100LL aviation=20 gasoline compare with 92 unleaded automobile gasoline; and alcohol = additive=20 octane booster and other local California boutique anti-smog winter = blends,=20 etc.?

Rod

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing = List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Jeremy=20 Fisher
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 4:51 = PM
To:=20 lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Hysol 9339 and Auto=20 Fuel

I am looking for ideas as to how I could ensure that my 360 wings = will be=20 compatible with Auto gas. The wings are finished as standard = using Hysol=20 adhesive. My engine has been built to be fully compatible with = auto gas,=20 as are the other fuel system components. I would like the option = to use=20 auto gas at times, partly because of concerns about future 100LL = availability,=20 and partly for cost reasons for the future. I understand that = there are=20 some concerns that auto gas can affect Hysol over time, and want to = seal the=20 exposed adhesive seam in the wing tanks.

Sloshing sealers have a bad reputation, plus there are multiple = types out=20 there, and I do not understand all the pros and cons. I was = thinking of=20 trying to thin Jeffco tank sealant, then introduce it into the tank = through=20 flexible clear hose, and tilt the tank to run it along the = seams. Does=20 anyone have a better idea? Am I right to be concerned about=20 compatibility with the Hysol for occasional or regular use? Any=20 non-flaming ideas would be welcome. Thanks.

Jerry Fisher

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C95403.43BA2EC0--