|
Jeff,
One small point. I am a satisfied user of the small tail. I
took my first civil flight lesson shortly after ordering a Lancair 320 slow
build kit, thus I have no military or ATP training or flight time. My
airplane can be trimmed all the way to touchdown and the elevator
has all the authority I have ever needed.
Either you have found out by personal experience or that of others that the
300 series Lancairs are, uh, less happy fliers when the CG is located in the aft
most quarter of its range. The Mark II tail alone exacerbates flight
problems at rearward CGs since it adds such a large rearward moment. Thus
the corollary recommendation that the long engine mount be used to
move the CG forward. This is especially true if lighter props and
equipment locations means the empty weight CG is not at least at the most
forward point so indicated in the build manual.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR)
Pilot
not TSO'd, Certificated score only > 70%.
In a message dated 9/27/2008 7:22:08 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
jeffreyb.peterson@gmail.com writes:
Harper,
About six years ago I faced the decision you now face,
asked the same questions, and ended up cutting out the small tail and
installing the larger one.
I made a web page of the process, and that
is somewhere on LML, maybe Marv can point you to it.
With all due
respect to my fine small-feathered friends, I find that the strongest
proponents of the small tail either once flew fighters, or now fly for a
major airline, or both.
They are much more current, experienced
pilots than I will ever be. They have been through the very best flight
training available.
My job forces me to take 3-6 month breaks from
flying. When I do fly I can do it often, but then I get involved in
something demanding at work, and I have a long layoff. After a layoff I
find myself controlling poorly the first few times back in the left
seat. I repeatedly retrain myself.
I wanted to be sure my Lancair
had plenty of elevator authority. I wanted to be able to trim right onto
the runway.
Also, the fact that Australia really truly did reject the
small tail version, then Lancair actually did change the design...that was
a factor for me.
I would say the large tail mod added 250 hours to my
build time.
I am right now dealing with the long mount cowl. I
have an angle valve 200 HP engine, and have had to completely rework the
cowl. I am nearly done but have at least 250 hours in the cowl as
well. I chose to make gradual changes, but if I were starting again I
would throw away the Lancair-provided junk and make my own from
scratch.
One comment: even though the cowl was c**p, the large tail
was very nicely built.
These are my thoughts and I hope you find
them useful.
Jeff
Peterson N273CK
-- Jeff Peterson Dept
of Physics, CMU
-- Jeff Peterson Dept of Physics,
CMU
-- For archives and unsub
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
|
|