|
I agree totally Bryan, I have had a few calls asking how slow can I fly my
lancair and how it will handle. I say, why do you ever want to fly your lancair
slow? Why not learn to fly it fast? Do you ever need to go slow in one? NO you
don't, learn to land them at a speed where you have a lot of room left for
error. Ron
www.ronsflying.com
In a message dated 9/2/2008 11:12:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
j.hafen@comcast.net writes:
Bryan
asks, “what does that mean for Lancair’s future?” if the IV series becomes
uninsurable.
More germane to me is the question of owning a $500k asset
that is uninsurable. And if I don’t want it because it is
uninsurable, then who would?
Right now, I’m happy to have the privilege
of paying almost $10k per year to insure N413AJ. I hope it stays
insurable and the rate doesn’t continue to increase.
As we discuss
safety and slow flight and spins and knowing the characteristics of an
individual planes and etc., I flashed back to my time in the USAF.
I
logged about 1,000 hours as an F4 back-seater. We practiced the ejection
sequence on a mechanical trainer. One would pull the handle and then
launch up a rail for maybe 25 feet. It was nothing at all like the bone
crushing ejection sequence of a real Martin-Baker ejection seat. We
parasailed behind jeeps and practiced Parachute Landing Falls (PLFs). We
parasailed behind speed boats and cut loose and landed in the water where we
inflated life rafts then got “rescued” by helicopters.
But they
never let us jump out of a real plane. It was too risky. Some of
us (not me) went to Fort Benning and got jump wings. The Air Force
didn’t really condone it. Too risky.
We did not spin the F4.
Once a guy got into a flat spin in an F4, you would just bail out.
First you would follow the checklist: “Stick Forward, Ailerons and
Rudder Neutral. If not recovered, maintain full forward stick and deploy
drag chute.” Then you would get out because the F4 just plain would not
recover from a flat spin.
So we simply avoided spins.
Everyone I
knew who used the Martin Baker ejection seat, with its explosive zero zero
ejection capability, got injured. But they survived. They might
have a couple of limbs in casts for a while or a bad back for the rest of
their lives, but at least they survived. (Whatever you do, do not look
down to make sure your seat belt is tight just before your back seater pulls
the ejection handle.)
So, for me personally, knowing that stalling my
IV may result in an unrecoverable spin, especially if I’m in uncoordinated
flight at the entrance, makes me a little more inclined to not poke
imprudently at the edge of the envelope. Even if you could get out of
the plane (I don’t believe you can) you don’t have an ejection seat.
And a parachute won’t help if you stall in your base to final leg,
or anywhere close to the ground.
So I’ll continue to fly fast, even in
the pattern, so I can go home and see the Farmer’s Daughter after I
fly. John Hafen IVP N413AJ Only 75
hours
On 8/31/08 4:49 AM, "Bryan Wullner" <vonjet@gmail.com>
wrote:
If the IV is or becomes un-insurable what does that
mean for Lancair's future? I would think insurance companies would
just start adding other Lancair models to the list of un-insurables too.
Whats wrong with mandatory initial training?
Bryan
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:11 PM, <vtailjeff@aol.com>
wrote:
John, Bryan & other like minded
individuals,
In case you have been living on another planet these
last few months you may not be aware of the crisis our deceased Lancair
brethren have created.
1. If you own a Lancair IV series aircraft
you have been informed by AIG that they will not renew your insurance
policy due to the Lancair losses this past year (and not all Lancair
losses are IV's). Although I was paying over $7000/ year for hull and
liability-- I may not be able to get it at all. Thank you very much.
2. The FAA is seriously considering making mandatory initial
training by an approved CFI prior to acting as PIC. Thank you very, very
much.
These aircraft are not toys. Please fly responsibly. We do
not need any more accidents. If you post your stuff on youtube.com--do not
be shocked that someone thinks negatively of you actions.
Best
Regards,
Jeff
-----Original Message----- From: marv@lancair.net To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent:
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 1:53 pm Subject: [LML] Legacy
video
Posted for "Jon Socolof" <jsocolof@ershire.com>:
Hi,
I've never posted on the LML
before but I'd like to respond to those unhappy with the Legacy
videos. I posted a video of my
Legacy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htM9K3BwXbU
and what you see is a "low approach" directly over the runway a
maneuver that is perfectly legal and safe. Everybody I have met
that has seen the video has enjoyed it. I'm sorry that some
feel it demonstrates reckless behavior, I simply disagree. I
built my airplane to enjoy and I'm proud of the video we shot.
For those that may be unhappy with my video I'd rather you
just appreciate it for what it is and go on your way without
comment. Jon
Socolof Legacy
212XP --
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
Get the MapQuest Toolbar <http://mapquest.com/toolbar?ncid=mpqmap00050000000010>
. Directions, Traffic, Gas Prices & More!
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
|
|