X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:45:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.46] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTP id 3087841 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:09:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.252.46; envelope-from=tom.gourley@verizon.net Received: from jacky0da39824a ([71.111.120.73]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K5Z00H2VCMCVY56@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:08:58 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:08:35 -0700 From: "Tom Gourley" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: some thoughts on accidents X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Reply-to: "Tom Gourley" X-Original-Message-id: <002601c903fb$ff0608f0$640610ac@jacky0da39824a> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01C903C1.4F8F90B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C903C1.4F8F90B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeff, Interesting numbers. However, the fact that no one has had an accident = who has more than 1000 hours in a Lancair may just mean there are only a = very small number of people with more than 1000 hours. I think a more = interesting set of data points, but probably a difficult one to come up = with, would be what percentage of pilots in your time in type ranges = have had accidents? What percentage with 0-10 hours, 11-25 hours, etc. = I think what we'd all expect is that as time in type goes up the = percentage of accidents in an experience range will go down. At least I = sure hope that what we'd see. Tom Gourley Accident summary from Jeff: 15 accident pilots 0-10 hours time in type Lancair --(many on their = first or second flight) 16 pilots 11-25 hours 13 pilots 26-50 hours 19 piltots 51-100 hours 19 pilots 101-200 hours 7 pilots 201-300 hours 12 pilots 301-500 hours 7 pilots 501-1000 hours 0 pilots > 1000 hours in type Lancair ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C903C1.4F8F90B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Jeff,
 
Interesting numbers.  However, the = fact that=20 no one has had an accident who has more than 1000 hours in a = Lancair=20 may just mean there are only a very small number of people = with more=20 than 1000 hours.  I think a more interesting set of data = points, but=20 probably a difficult one to come up with, would be what percentage = of=20 pilots in your time in type ranges have had accidents?  What = percentage=20 with 0-10 hours, 11-25 hours, etc.  I think what we'd all = expect is=20 that as time in type goes up the percentage of accidents in an = experience range will go down.  At least I sure hope that what = we'd=20 see.
 
Tom Gourley
 
Accident summary from = Jeff:
15 accident pilots 0-10 hours time in type Lancair --(many on their = first=20 or second flight)
16 pilots 11-25 hours
13 pilots  26-50 = hours
19=20 piltots 51-100 hours
19 pilots  101-200 hours
7   = pilots=20 201-300 hours
12 pilots 301-500 hours
7 pilots   = 501-1000=20 hours
0 pilots > 1000 hours in type Lancair
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C903C1.4F8F90B0--