Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:11:37 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-3063018@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.96; envelope-from=j.hafen@comcast.net
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.11.0.080522
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FAA comment on new 51%  A/B Ruling
From: John Hafen <j.hafen@comcast.net>
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: FAA comment on new 51%  A/B Ruling
Thread-Index: Acj3IyvAg3bn+V5I8ECIMKCkfmF0aA==
In-Reply-To: <list-3052087@logan.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Ok Hamid,  I'll bite.

You obviously disagree with my statement.  So I respectfully stand by to
hear your rationale. Thanks for being man enough to disagree, and to tell m=
e
why.  I respect that.

Meanwhile, I'll continue to prepare my list of specific things where I felt
the commercial builder expertise was superior to mine.

John

On 8/1/08 5:45 PM, "Hamid Wasti" <hwasti@lm50.com> wrote:

> John Hafen wrote:
>> It can=B9t be about safety, because the commercial builders out there
>> are way better at their jobs than many of us amateurs are
> Can you please cite some facts to back up that statement.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Hamid
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht=
ml