X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:56:30 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [65.121.222.243] (HELO agcsrvr.AGCEngineering.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with ESMTP id 3043525 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:28:48 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.121.222.243; envelope-from=JohnB@agcheattransfer.com X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-Ninja-AttachmentFiltering: (no action) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [LML] Gap Seals X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:28:08 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <21105FE689C16E45BFCD702D4D921DCA06D643@agcsrvr.AGCEngineering.com> In-Reply-To: Thread-Topic: [LML] Gap Seals thread-index: AcjvG2BxyKBUkJOlTYOnTQlrc5kSQgAOiyJg References: From: "John C. Bohn" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" I'd be interested in hearing about this too.....I've got "heavy" in-flight forces too....I think its abnormal. John C. Bohn N28487 Lancair 4P LIV209 Direct (Cell)- 503-887-2933 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of billhogarty Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 7:30 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Gap Seals For Greyhawk: Although my ailerons move freely on the ground, the in-flight force=20 required in my 4P is greater than I would hope for. I was considering=20 gap seals as a possible remedy. Since I understand that you have=20 installed gap seals on your machine, could we have your before and after experience with respect to aileron force and/or any other secrets you=20 might like to share. BTW, does any other L-IV have this problem? Thanks, Bill Hogarty -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html