Return-Path: Received: from centurion.flash.net ([209.30.0.22]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA611 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 14:31:39 -0400 Received: from flash.net (p136.amax3.dialup.sat1.flash.net [209.30.90.136]) by centurion.flash.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA17720; Tue, 8 Sep 1998 13:31:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <35F577DA.15E77381@flash.net> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 13:30:50 -0500 From: Ken Harwood X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win98; U) To: John Cooper , Lancair List Subject: RE: MT Prop X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> John, I have been running my Lancair 360 with the 200 HP+ engine and the 3-bladed MT12B prop for over 6 years now and have had very little problem with it. Once, when running the Sun 100 race I had the prop go to 3500 rpm due to cavitation of the prop governor due to oil getting too hot and foaming up in the governor. This was not a problem with the prop itself. Because of this over speed of more that 25 percent I had the prop disassembled and checked. There was no damage. Since that time [over 5 years] the propellor has had no internal maintenance. The ability to withstand that kind of overspeed is a pretty good indication that the prop is tough. I have checked with the manufacturer and found that the prop should go 1500 to 2000 hours before maintenance is required. Once in awhile, if the plane hasn't been flown for quite some time during the winter I will get a trace of grease escape from the hub of the prop. I have heard that this is normal. The prop now has 550 hours on it. I believe the MT prop is a good choice for the Lancair due to the tremendous speed range the plane is capable of. You don't have to worry about harmonics between the engine and the prop as you do with all metal props. Ken Harwood N15KH