X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:35:42 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [66.64.141.200] (HELO lucky.dts.local) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTP id 2919395 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 May 2008 19:22:47 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.64.141.200; envelope-from=cjensen@dts9000.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8B486.C13049A6" Subject: RE: [LML] Identifying aircraft X-Original-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:19:51 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <8984A39879F2F5418251CBEEC9C689B33CF21D@lucky.dts.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Identifying aircraft Thread-Index: AcizwxsiSEnEYC0YQS6O5plUUoGA6QAw5Ld6 References: From: "Chuck Jensen" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" , This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8B486.C13049A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Curious. How do you have a gear up landing with no prop strike? Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List on behalf of es39wg@comcast.net Sent: Sun 5/11/2008 8:01 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Identifying aircraft =20 I submit this link for those who speculate about a particular aircraft. If you bookmark it, you can be the first to know if a reported tail = number and type are correct. If you check all the boxes at the right before clicking the GO button = after you fill in the tail number in question, you will get all the = reported accidents/incidents that are reported. =20 NOTE: Many incidents do not require reporting to the FAA. That is why = so many gear up landings never show. Insufficient damage to require a = report. Many gear up accidents are non-events particularly if there is = no prop strike thus requiring an engine tear down and inspection. Even = then some are not reported. I happen to have just bought one of them, = No FAA report but the log books show the repairs. http://www.myairplane.com/databases/aircraft_report/index.php duane=20 -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8B486.C13049A6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: [LML] Identifying aircraft

Curious. How do you have a gear up landing with no = prop strike?

Chuck


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List on behalf of es39wg@comcast.net
Sent: Sun 5/11/2008 8:01 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Identifying aircraft

I submit this link for those who speculate about a particular = aircraft.
If you bookmark it, you can be the first to know if a reported tail = number and type are correct.
If you check all the boxes at the right before clicking the GO button = after you fill in the tail number in question, you will get all the = reported accidents/incidents that are reported. 
NOTE: Many incidents do not require reporting to the FAA.  That is = why so many gear up landings never show.  Insufficient damage to = require a report.  Many gear up accidents are non-events = particularly if there is no prop strike thus requiring an engine tear = down and inspection.  Even then some are not reported.  I = happen to have just bought one of them,  No FAA report but the log = books show the repairs.

ht= tp://www.myairplane.com/databases/aircraft_report/index.php

duane

--
For archives and unsub http://mail= .lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8B486.C13049A6--