X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:41:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTP id 2918596 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 May 2008 09:29:44 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=W0i6J/o6XU7NXD+qc+JLe4MBlYqKPIrZE6SiNJwjlHpFmmv2N0pgfDmQzDHUhpwY; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [97.91.158.76] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JvY5P-0004hA-Ve for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 May 2008 09:29:04 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <076401c8b434$25c95630$6501a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Crash, fueling nozzles and training X-Original-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 08:29:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0761_01C8B40A.3C917F20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da94066479a898ab30f96a11eb9970b744a4e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 97.91.158.76 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0761_01C8B40A.3C917F20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable thanks Keith for posting that sunrise link. I was surprised to find they were using such a low airspeed on these = turns. I would have thought high bank angle at best glide speed would = have been more effective. Can anyone argue why just above stall would = work better? ------=_NextPart_000_0761_01C8B40A.3C917F20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

thanks Keith for posting that sunrise=20 link.

I was surprised to find they were using = such a low=20 airspeed on these turns. I would have thought high bank = angle at=20 best glide speed would have been more effective. Can = anyone=20 argue why just above stall would work better? =20

------=_NextPart_000_0761_01C8B40A.3C917F20--