X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [76.190.204.56] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.2.2)
  with HTTP id 2868120 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:37:05 -0400
From: marv@lancair.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Prop diameter
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.2.2
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:37:05 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2868120@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C4ABAC27F0E46898320A4A56A02654E@ARPTK8NG400>
References: <list-2866299@logan.com>
 <5C4ABAC27F0E46898320A4A56A02654E@ARPTK8NG400>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1;format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>:

  Peter,
  
  It seems to me that the "preferred" prop would be the prop best suited for
  your application.  They tell me that a three blade is smoother than a two
  blade.but, smoother enough that I would care???
  
  I think it is more about the HP you are expecting the prop to absorb.  If
  you can only swing about 70-72 inches, and  are running 300 HP or so, you
  will need a three blade to absorb it.  If you are lower in HP, you can
  probably get by with a two blade.
  
  Otherwise, it boils down to how sexy do you think it looks, and how tall are
  you when sitting on your wallet.  :>)
  
  
  
  Bill B