|
Hi Randy and all who responded,
this is exactly the information I am looking for. I was in contact with Hartzell and they gave me the info as you described - to reduce the prop to 72", and yes, it is the F7666 original prop. Unfortunately it comes with a spinner (chromed) which is a bit to large for the original cowling.
- Have you done anything with respect to clearance ? - What is your prop clearance in inch ? - Can you provide any performance data (e.g. climb, speed...) ?
Again, thanks to all other responses who gave me a bit more technical insight with respect to 2 and 3 blade configuration and their dis-/advantages.
Someone told me, that the 2 blade configuration has less drag and therefore is the preferred choice. I can follow your argumentation with respect to diameter and drag (as electrical engineer) - I assume it is a bit more complex to conclude what is more efficient 2 blade with (less) drag with larger diameter or 3 blade with less diameter but more drag due to more blades ?
OK, it is an academic question but isn't that why we are doing all of this building ?
Looking forward to more interesting discussions,
thanks and take care
Peter, 360 MKII, 90%
2008/4/21, marv@lancair.net <marv@lancair.net>:
Posted for "Randy" <randystuart@hotmail.com>:
I'm running a Mooney Prop cut to 72" on my 360. It's the Hartzell compact
hub with F7666-4 blades and a prop extension. Runs great. I have no
clearance problems. This was the prop most people used before Hartzell come
out with the F7068 prop, and Lancair started selling them some years back.
Randy Stuart
LNC-2
|
|