Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #4681
From: John Wright <jwrightdo@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Fw: AV Web Article
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 20:57:19 -0700
To: LML <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
         <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>

-----Original Message-----
From: John Wright <jwrightdo@worldnet.att.net>
To: Larry Klaas <ldkatbend@transport.com>
Date: Sunday, February 13, 2000 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: AV Web Article


>Larry,  I feel most comfortable flying my iv-p- at the upper teens partly
>because I have the option of flight following or instruments if I choose,
>but I am reasonabley comfortable up to FL250 because I've been there a
>number of times before and it is still low enough that I think I have more
>options than I would at FL290 in an emergency.  One thing addressed during
>the high altitude endorsement given to me by the person who use to run the
>altitude chamber here in Colorado Springs is paying attention to Mach
>numbers.  He pointed out from the graph in the iv -p POH that the Mach
>number at FL290 is about 195 kts indicated, ie above that air speed you are
>exceeding Vne.  I think flying at FL250 over overcast is a different
>decision particularly if there is icing than flying at the same altitude
VMC
>because if the cloud deck rises you are forced higher and you have fewer
>options.  The other thing I learned during the high altitude check out is
>that having enough standby oxygen to fly another hour is a real advantage
>because at 300kts TAS  you can often find better weather conditions if you
>are caught over unfavorable IMC. As the article points out the time of
>useful conciousness is three to six minutes at 25,000' vs. 30 min. at
>18,000'.  So in answer to your question I think I like flying in the high
>teens but I can be lured up into the flight levels by favorable tail winds
>and good weather.  Other's thoughts?  Also, a question for the group:  Is
>there any logic to pressurizing the cabin to 3.5 to 4 psi rather than 5psi
>thinking that the cabin is being physically stressed less and less of an
>explosive decompression if that should happen?  Incidentally,  I didn't
>pressurize for a few months!  It took that long to get all of the leaks
>plugged!  Good luck with the maiden flight, that's a great day.  John
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry Klaas <ldkatbend@transport.com>
>To: jwrightdo@worldnet.att.net <jwrightdo@worldnet.att.net>
>Date: Sunday, February 13, 2000 3:47 PM
>Subject: AV Web Article
>
>
>>I'm about 45 days from my first flight on my 4P.  Read the AV web article
>>you mentioned.
>>
>>So how high do you fly now after reading it?
>>
>>Larry Klaas
>>21725 Rickard Rd
>>Bend, OR 97702
>>Tel: 541-389-2900  Fax: 208-361-5849
>>
>>
>>
>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster