X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:53:02 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2787760 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:00:14 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.252.40; envelope-from=tom.gourley@verizon.net Received: from jacky0da39824a ([71.111.144.43]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JXL002AOKFYD5S0@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:02:26 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:59:09 -0700 From: "Tom Gourley" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: VM1000 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Reply-to: "Tom Gourley" X-Original-Message-id: <001101c883ed$0b8ff250$650610ac@jacky0da39824a> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=response Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: This is interesting. I've heard a lot of complaints about JPI's support, or lack of, for the VM1000. Then I opened the April issue of Kitplanes and there's a full page ad inside the front cover for the VM1000C. JPI is keeping the Vision Microsystems name alive. At the bottom of the page it says "Vision Microsystems Inc. a J.P. Instruments Company". However on further inspection of the ad I noticed that the VM1000C doesn't look quite like the original VM1000. In fact, it looks a lot like JPI's EDM900. I'm guessing that they're supporting the VM1000C as it's probably an EDM900 in disguise where the VM1000 is a completely different box. Tom Gourley