X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:49:05 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.reflex.co.za ([196.23.156.200] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2759389 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:59:38 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=196.23.156.200; envelope-from=pine@cpro.co.za Received: from [41.240.153.50] by mail.reflex.co.za [196.23.156.200] with SmartMax MailMax for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:00:01 +0200 X-Original-Return-Path: X-SmartMax-AuthUser: X-Original-Message-ID: <003201c8791e$b6cff180$3500a8c0@LTDC2> Reply-To: "Pieter Pienaar" From: "Pieter Pienaar" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] 51% rule X-Original-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:56:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Silly question time ? Are the manufactures of Ultra light aircraft typed as "certified" manufactures or are they listed under another coding. Here in South Africa we to have the 51% rule but it applies to who has the authority to do maintenance on the aircraft. To this degree, if its a "professionally" assembled plane then "they" get the maintenance rights and "they" has to be inspected and "typed" as a professional assembler by our CAA under one of those "other" codings, just like the ultra light manufactures. Pieter Pienaar