Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #45903
From: <MikeEasley@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Flexible hose assemblies
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:05:44 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Brent,
 
I disagree with a couple things you said about hoses vs. aluminum tubing.  First, I didn't find the 1/2" aluminum tubing "easy to fabricate".  I didn't have the very expensive tool and used an inexpensive one.  I had significant collapsing in the radius bends and scoring of the outside tubing wall.  Neither of those was acceptable to me on a fuel line.  So the downside of aluminum tubing for me is the same reason you give for Aeroquip, the potential for poor workmanship.
 
Second, aluminum tubing needs to be properly secured to prevent chafing just like Aeroquip, but if you get chafing on Aeroquip, it's the airframe that will wear, not the hose.  That seems to give the advantage to Aeroquip, at least unintended chaffing won't cause a fuel leak.
 
I agree on the cost, weight and lifespan issues, and I appreciate your comments.
 
Mike Easley
Colorado Springs




Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster