X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:29:54 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2631547 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:23:05 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.2; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.cf6.25952be8 (37127) for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 21:22:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from WEBMAIL-DF02 (webmail-df02.webmail.aol.com [205.188.104.66]) by cia-ma02.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMA021-9107477ee9de2b; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:22:22 -0500 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: One mag, one electronic ignition X-Original-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:22:22 -0500 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 72.19.171.41 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CA1D58F05CBDE9_8FC_6101_WEBMAIL-DF02.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33706-STANDARD Received: from 72.19.171.41 by WEBMAIL-DF02.sysops.aol.com (205.188.104.66) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:22:22 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CA1D58F05CBDE9-8FC-3070@WEBMAIL-DF02.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8CA1D58F05CBDE9_8FC_6101_WEBMAIL-DF02.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" <> Umm, gee, this is very different from my conclusion.? I figure the magneto *is* the seriously bullet proof backup solution, which is what allows me to be cavalier about installing a box that a thousand other guys use that features an unknown timing curve that is powered by a single string electrical system. The only thing I'm certain about is that the engine will keep on running -- or at least it will be getting a spark.? I could still screw up with the fuel or the air... (I'm not criticizing, I'm just saying that our conclusions are different, so don't take this personally.? It's not meant as an insult at all.) - Rob Wolf ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com ----------MB_8CA1D58F05CBDE9_8FC_6101_WEBMAIL-DF02.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" <<conclusion:  I decided to stick with 2 mags until I see a seriously bullet proof backup power solution>>

Umm, gee, this is very different from my conclusion.  I figure the magneto *is* the seriously bullet proof backup solution, which is what allows me to be cavalier about installing a box that a thousand other guys use that features an unknown timing curve that is powered by a single string electrical system.

The only thing I'm certain about is that the engine will keep on running -- or at least it will be getting a spark.  I could still screw up with the fuel or the air...

(I'm not criticizing, I'm just saying that our conclusions are different, so don't take this personally.  It's not meant as an insult at all.)

- Rob Wolf


More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail!
----------MB_8CA1D58F05CBDE9_8FC_6101_WEBMAIL-DF02.sysops.aol.com--