X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:55:19 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.240.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2627175 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:41:22 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.9; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080101214042.BBNW24467.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:40:42 -0500 Received: from eastrmwml07.mgt.cox.net ([172.18.111.188]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Xxfn1Y00643w5XQ0000000; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:39:47 -0500 Received: from 75.91.91.14 by webmail.east.cox.net; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:40:42 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <20080101164042.D3ZBZ.216598.root@eastrmwml07.mgt.cox.net> X-Original-Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:40:42 -0500 From: <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: GRT HX EFIS X-Original-Cc: Tom Gourley In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal Yes, this is quite true. Sorry that I failed to mention it in my earlier post. That's the main reason that I wanted the empty "boxes". Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 1,450 hrs N6ZQ IV under construction ---- Tom Gourley wrote: > "I have the old series 1 and like it, would consider upgrading to the HX" > > Art, > > Are you aware that the HX box won't fit in the same space as the original > Series 1? The width is slightly different, 7.1" vs 7.25", but the HX is > 0.5" taller. Upgrading will require panel modifications. > > Tom Gourley > > > > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html