X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:14:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mtao05.charter.net ([209.225.8.179] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2579462 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:58:10 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.8.179; envelope-from=LHenney@charter.net Received: from aarprv04.charter.net ([10.20.200.74]) by mtao05.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20071213145723.NLGP20095.mtao05.charter.net@aarprv04.charter.net> for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:57:23 -0500 Received: from LHenneyLaptop ([24.182.195.198]) by aarprv04.charter.net with ESMTP id <20071213145721.CWUH17353.aarprv04.charter.net@LHenneyLaptop> for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:57:21 -0500 From: "LHenney" X-Original-To: "Lancair List" Subject: FW: 320/360 Elevator RIGGING X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:57:21 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <00e901c83d98$785e2be0$650fa8c0@LHenneyLaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acg9lilN1QsqOhm9QYqlnx1TvvuENQAAdfOg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Chzlrs: 0 Garry, Yes, in this case, more is fine. I believe that quote came because there was a guy who had his bob weight in upside down (appearing right side up, btw). He was unable to get enough forward stick authority to exit his stall testing and went crunch. IMHO, the 1/4" is affectively a "no interference" requirement. Larry -----Original Message----- From: Laznicka, Garry [MCCUS] [mailto:GLaznic@MCCUS.JNJ.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:05 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: 320/360 Elevator RIGGING Looking at the page 15-28 Rev 6/04-01-99 in "Lancair 320FB manual" where Figure-9a is depicted, it's specified there that with full elevator down (11 degrees) the Elevator Idler arm (which supports the Bob weight) to be 1/4" from Rear push/pull tube. My question is: Would that be acceptable to have this distance at 0.59" Or is it absolutely critical that I have it at 0.25" I am maxed out on push-rods travel at this point. Thank you in advance for your suggestions and advice. Regards, Garry V. Laznicka L-360c 85%