X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:32:10 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m20.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.1] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 2385635 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:17:16 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.1; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-m20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.c0e.175fcbe8 (45781) for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:16:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from webmail-mf12 (webmail-mf12.webmail.aol.com [64.12.88.225]) by ciaaol-m01.mx.aol.com (v119.11) with ESMTP id MAILCIAAOLM015-b2d547117c04331; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:16:36 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Drag coefficient X-Original-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:16:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8C9DC1F6220AAA7_1DC_2165A_webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 31361-STANDARD Received: from 24.253.159.190 by webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com (64.12.88.225) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:16:37 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8C9DC1F6220AAA7-1DC-108DB@webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 64.12.88.225 X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8C9DC1F6220AAA7_1DC_2165A_webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" the stopped or feathered prop produces the least drag -----Original Message----- From: Sky2high@aol.com To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 5:43 pm Subject: [LML] Re: Drag coefficient In a message dated 10/12/2007 7:00:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, troneill@charter.net writes: Always heard that windmilling props make a lot more drag than stopped props. Not if they are CS and have been pulled back to coarse pitch. ? Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) Darwinian culling phrase: Watch This! See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com ----------MB_8C9DC1F6220AAA7_1DC_2165A_webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
the stopped or feathered prop produces the least drag



-----Original Message-----
From: Sky2high@aol.com
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 5:43 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: Drag coefficient

In a message dated 10/12/2007 7:00:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, troneill@charter.net writes:
Always heard that windmilling props make a lot more drag than stopped props.
Not if they are CS and have been pulled back to coarse pitch.
 
Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)

Darwinian culling phrase: Watch This!




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail!
----------MB_8C9DC1F6220AAA7_1DC_2165A_webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com--