X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:08:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 2377764 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:58:20 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=douglasbrunner@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=NWbK3iNG2omtWepeVxpUMpUlorQpO5LLmfr7fmfUxbC+pfjX/Hl2BFmrH2jVISck; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [74.93.196.177] (helo=DFWK3391) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1IfJKx-0007h9-4x for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:57:43 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <006e01c80a9d$df340250$19d0a60a@DFWK3391> From: "Douglas Brunner" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Backup DG equivalent X-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:57:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1250"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-ELNK-Trace: ad85a799c4f5de37c2eb1477c196d22294f5150ab1c16ac01a238acc8405a5b0d42e8f5dec0e244294b9724d0ac63609350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 74.93.196.177 I would like to second John's opinion on the Tru Trak ADI. I had one ordered and paid for, but sent it back, paid the restocking charge and got a standard attitude indicator for a higher price. It was just the scenario that John mentions that made me do it. The Tru Trak will function much like an AI at higher speeds, but if you are slow and close to stall the behavior of the ADI and the AI will diverge. Assume you are 10 kts above stall, nose high, and losing altitude. The AI will show you nose high, the ADI will show you "nose low" (I know this is not correct, but for someone like me, in an emergency this is how I would probably interpret it). It seems to me that with the ADI I might be tempted to pull back and correct may altitude loss - thus precipitating a stall. With the AI, I would know to add power and push. I am sure that my misinterpretation of the ADI could be corrected with lots of training and for some people the ADI may be what they want. But for me (and people like me) I think it could be dangerous. My 2 cents ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Barrett" <2thman@cablespeed.com> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:38 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Backup DG equivalent For the enlightenment of all vis a vis the Tru Trak ADI, I spoke with Lucas of Tru Trak this afternoon. First of all he told me the “pitch” indication, as was mentioned before in this thread, is not pitch at all, but rather VSI. Therefore if the aircraft is losing altitude, the indicator will be expected to show accurate roll information, but will look as if the nose of the aircraft is below horizontal when in fact you could be nose up. I would consider this to be a very dangerous situation at any time I needed to use the instrument. Just consider the unpleasant event you could face when your Cheltons or other MFD’s all crap out while you’re in IMC and there is lots of turbulence. First you have to reorient your scan to instruments that you only use in practice, and then you have to overcome your well ingrained training that says this thing that looks like an attitude indicator is NOT. While your brain is assimilating this disparity between past learning and reality, precious seconds are going by and the turbulence has caused your aircraft attitude to change to any position other than wings level and nose level – probably to be swinging past those desirable positions somewhat erratically. I think it’s a shame this very nice instrument has what I think is a fatal flaw. It’s too bad Tru Trak put an electronic roll gyro in this thing, but didn’t think a pitch gyro was necessary. I sincerely hope they’ll rethink the concept and will correct this discrepancy. I will look forward to buying one to complement my Tru Trak autopilot if they do. By the way, the heading indication is totally GPS dependent and does not derive information from the gyro or gyros that would allow it to keep providing heading data if GPS is lost. That would be another improvement if it could use GPS to stabilize and correct a gyro track, which would continue to function albeit with less accuracy when the GPS is lost. My 2 cents. Regards, John Barrett As a backup direction indicator on my Legacy, which also has a 2-screen Chelton EFIS system, I'm using the 2-1/4" ADI from Tru-Trak. It's a bit of an odd critter, but if you buy it with the GPS and backup battery options, it does give a heading (track, actually) indication that's completely independent of your plane's electrical system. It also provides pitch and bank info. Hard to find equivalent info from 2-1/4" instruments without spending a fortune. Jim Cameron Legacy N132X No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.5/1058 - Release Date: 10/8/2007 4:54 PM -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html