X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:47:19 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost05.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.105] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2286156 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:29:55 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.105; envelope-from=paulhershorin@bellsouth.net Received: from mail.bellsouth.net (imf87aec-pub.mail.bellsouth.net[205.152.58.137]) by bellsouth.net (frfwmhc05) with SMTP id <20070826222918H0500jpgn5e>; Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:29:18 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [205.152.58.137] X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.16.1 (webedge20-101-1106-101-20040924) X-Originating-IP: [74.225.181.176] From: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Carbon fiber 360 kit? X-Original-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:29:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Message-ID: I purchased my carbon fiber 360 kit in1998. Paul Hershorin N 471 LA 360---best decision I made> > > From: Earl Schroeder > Date: 2007/08/26 Sun PM 02:03:39 EDT > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: Carbon fiber 360 kit? > > Thanks Bill [& Sue} and all others who responded. The 'answers' have been forwarded. Earl > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Bill & Sue <5zq@cox.net> > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:21:52 AM > Subject: [LML] Re: Carbon fiber 360 kit? > > > DIV { > MARGIN:0px;} > > It's a fact, Earl. I have personally seen one under > construction. It was for sale quite a while ago, not sure who owns it now but it > used to belong to Gary Laznika in Pennsylvania. > > > Bill Harrelson > N5ZQ 320 1,400 hrs > N6ZQ IV under construction > > > > > > > A > fellow pilot and Lancair IV kit owner (partial kit) ask for confirmation that > a carbon fiber 360 kit was available in the past. > Does anyone remember > this to be a fact? Or is he just confused? > Thanks, > Earl > > > >