X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net> Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:00:27 -0400 Message-ID: <redirect-2278576@logan.com> X-Original-Return-Path: <colyncase@earthlink.net> Received: from mx2.pshift.com ([216.57.116.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2278557 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:51:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.57.116.7; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt2 (unverified [216.57.118.64]) by mx2.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.568.54) with SMTP id <B0331047296@mx2.pshift.com> for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:51:11 -0400 Received-SPF: none (mx2.pshift.com: domain of colyncase@earthlink.net does not designate any permitted senders) X-Modus-BlackList: 216.57.118.64=OK;colyncase@earthlink.net=OK X-Modus-RBL: 216.57.118.64=Excluded X-Modus-Trusted: 216.57.118.64=NO X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 X-Original-Message-ID: <156801c7e4dc$ac75ae40$0302a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net> References: <list-2278497@logan.com> Subject: Re: [LML] What engine would you buy? X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:51:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1565_01C7E4BB.253906A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_1565_01C7E4BB.253906A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable you'll find that time on the phone is a big impediment to getting done, = in general. If you want to avoid that, always go with the vendor that has the best = reputation for schedule and service. therefore, I would say Barrett on the engine. I don't know of anyone doing a side by side comparison of a Barrett = Engine to a PE engine and finding the PE engine is faster. I do know = of a Barrett powered lnc4 that does over 300 knots. In avionics - Aerotronics has the best rep. ------=_NextPart_000_1565_01C7E4BB.253906A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =3D=20 "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =3D=20 "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =3D=20 "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =3D=20 "http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE>@font-face { font-family: Cambria Math; } @font-face { font-family: Calibri; } @page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; } P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: = "Calibri","sans-serif" } LI.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: = "Calibri","sans-serif" } DIV.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: = "Calibri","sans-serif" } A:link { COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 } SPAN.MsoHyperlink { COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 } A:visited { COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 } SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 } SPAN.EmailStyle17 { COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: = personal-compose } .MsoChpDefault { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only } DIV.Section1 { page: Section1 } </STYLE> <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD> <BODY lang=3DEN-US vLink=3Dpurple link=3Dblue bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>you'll find that time on the phone is a = big=20 impediment to getting done, in general.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If you want to avoid that, always go = with the=20 vendor that has the best reputation for schedule and = service.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>therefore, I would say Barrett on the=20 engine.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I don't know of anyone doing a side by = side=20 comparison of a Barrett Engine to a PE engine and finding the PE engine = is=20 faster. I do know of a Barrett powered lnc4 that does over = 300=20 knots.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>In avionics - Aerotronics has the best=20 rep.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_1565_01C7E4BB.253906A0--