X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:11:22 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc2-s18.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.154] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2196497 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:49:45 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.154; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.250.86]) by bay0-omc2-s18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:49:06 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:49:06 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 70.58.159.1 by BAY115-DAV14.phx.gbl with DAV; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:49:05 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [70.58.159.1] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Sender: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: Elevator Controls X-Original-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:49:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0640_01C7CDCF.7FF4EA30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.50.0039.1900 Seal-Send-Time: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:49:09 -0700 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2007 15:49:06.0411 (UTC) FILETIME=[2AA9BBB0:01C7CE0A] X-Original-Return-Path: gary21sn@hotmail.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0640_01C7CDCF.7FF4EA30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the input guys. I talked to Lancair today and the problem =20 is that since I followed the set up in my plans it ends up with the =20 after pushrod being too short. So I either have to make my aft =20 pushrod longer (costs about $100 in parts and shipping) or I did take =20 my bob weight and mounted it on the underside of the bellcrank arms. =20 This brings the mass lower and closer to the pushrod. Lancair =20 didn't see anything wrong with doing this. Anybody have any comments =20 on this approach? Bryan At the other end of the elevator travel with the bob-weight arm up high, = will it be in conflict with the rear bulkhead hat shelf and close-out = panel? Gary Edwards LNC2 N21SN Medford, Oregon ------=_NextPart_000_0640_01C7CDCF.7FF4EA30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for the input guys. I talked to Lancair today and = the=20 problem
is that since I followed the set up in my plans it = ends up=20 with the
after pushrod being too short. So I either have = to make=20 my aft
pushrod longer (costs about $100 in parts and shipping) = or I=20 did take
my bob weight and mounted it on the underside of the=20 bellcrank arms.
This brings the mass lower and closer to = the=20 pushrod. Lancair
didn't see anything wrong with doing=20 this. Anybody have any comments
on this=20 approach?
Bryan

At the other end of the elevator travel with the bob-weight arm up = high,=20 will it be in conflict with the rear bulkhead hat shelf and close-out=20 panel?

Gary Edwards

LNC2 N21SN

Medford, Oregon

------=_NextPart_000_0640_01C7CDCF.7FF4EA30--