Return-Path: Received: from smtp6.gateway.net ([208.230.117.250]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 21:02:22 -0500 Received: from oemcomputer (1Cust64.tnt2.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [63.20.49.64]) by smtp6.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA04326 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 21:07:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000601bf5334$5034b6e0$4031143f@oemcomputer> Reply-To: "dfs" From: "dfs" To: "Lancair List" Subject: antennae, basic rules, & other urban legends legends Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 18:09:29 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Lot's of interesting stuff in the last posting, gang. Here's my .02c, as Brent puts it. I have two coms in my 235 (KX-155 and King GPS with a com) and I found room - not a lot of room, but room - for two com antennas. One was built into the vertical stab a la the early plans (not being sure whether that's still recommended). The second is a Bob Archer com unit - looks like about a three-foot long aluminum zig-zag silly sculpture - that works very well. This thing was fitted just aft of the rear cabin bulkhead and had to be bent into an arc to be stuck to the inside of the fuselage at that station. Used the household sticky stuff called "GOOP" I bought at the local hardware store to glue it in place - man! that stuff'll stick anything to anything! (Had originally intended to just put it in on a temporary basis to test the thing - but couldn't get it un-stuck without damaging it, so I left it as is). Looks UGLY! Works better'n the one I purchased from the factory and put in the tail. Since I never let anybody look back there except when I'm doing an annual or fiddling with the battery, the fact that it's UGLY! doesn't bother me a bit. Had reflected energy checked at the local avionics shop and found the VSWR for the original Com antenna was so high as to be marginally acceptable while the Bob Archer antenna averaged around 1.2 - 1.25:1 over the band. The Archer unit is now my No.1 Com antenna. All the other antennas, save the GPS, were kits from the Grass Valley outfit, and includes Glide Slope (right wing - outer bay), VOR/Localizer (horizontal stab), Marker Beacon (inside the belly on the left side, and it is quite long as the MB frequency is fairly low) and Xponder (Left wing - just inside the wingtip). The xponder and VOR antennas function particularly well - I've never had ATC complain that they couldn't see me on radar and the VOR antenna usually sees stations further out than is generally useful. The material kits for the Nav and Com radios plus the Xponder antenna kit - includes spike and back-plane - was CHEAP! Don't remember just how cheap but less than $50 - 60 and I hac stuff left over. Sometimes, lo-tech works better than hi (in certain very selective categories, of course) to which I can attest when, as my last task at Rockwell/Boeing, I oversaw the replacement of very high-tech NiCad batteries (and their terribly complex chargers) with Sealed Lead-Acid units on the B-1B. Ended up saving the Gov't about 15 megabucks over the life of the bomber! So, as I've said here many times before, you pays your money and you takes your chances. Dan Schaefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>