X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:02:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mx3.pshift.com ([216.57.116.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2043811 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:41:33 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.57.116.8; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt2 (unverified [216.57.118.92]) by mx3.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.571.23) with SMTP id for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:40:47 -0400 X-Modus-BlackList: 216.57.118.92=OK;colyncase@earthlink.net=OK X-Modus-RBL: 216.57.118.92=Excluded X-Modus-Trusted: 216.57.118.92=NO X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 X-Original-Message-ID: <02ec01c79646$a3fa8590$0702a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case on earthlink" X-Original-To: Subject: IV-P turbo question X-Original-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:40:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02E9_01C7960B.F769A110" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02E9_01C7960B.F769A110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does anyone have proof or documentation that the standard TCM supplied = turbines do or do not have inconel rotors? The latter are supposedly rated for 1750 dF continuous duty. Colyn Case IVP=20 ------=_NextPart_000_02E9_01C7960B.F769A110 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does anyone have proof or documentation = that the=20 standard TCM supplied turbines do or do not have inconel = rotors?

The latter are supposedly rated for = 1750 dF=20 continuous duty.

Colyn Case

IVP

------=_NextPart_000_02E9_01C7960B.F769A110--