Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #40637
From: Bill Kennedy <bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: enough runway"
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:37:15 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
I agree with Jeff. I also think a touch and go should be second nature if you're at all concerned about getting your plane stopped in the available runway.

Bill Kennedy
N42BK


From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com
Reply-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: enough runway"
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:37:21 -0400

If you think you need a drag chute for the occasional "aw shit the runway  is
too dang short" instances then IMHO your preflight planning is flawed. Like I
 said before, take the distance you can get the aircraft stopped in (from a
50'  height) and then double that and that is your landing distance
requirement. 50%  of all GA accidnts are takeoff and landing accidents. Being too
optimistic on  landing distance required is not a good thing.

Regards,

Jeff Edwards
LIVP N619SJ
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at
http://www.aol.com.

_________________________________________________________________
With tax season right around the corner, make sure to follow these few simple tips. http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.aspx?icid=HMFebtagline

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster