X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:15:32 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1838437 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:04:36 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=rtitsworth@mindspring.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=fX+lI7KN0VMcZhVGJ8KhgVfolX74lo74nPH0yeFqTSnTT6UmFvg4EM5J+JeZQwGs; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-reply-to:Thread-Index:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [68.40.94.44] (helo=RDTVAIO) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HHU6F-0006dw-1W for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:03:47 -0500 From: "rtitsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: SS Braided brake lines X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:03:33 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <006e01c75094$bbe7a1d0$6400a8c0@RDTVAIO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006F_01C7506A.D31199D0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-reply-to: Thread-Index: AcdQZ+nvqMWm02hnQ6W3VT3cAwadnwALJdNA X-ELNK-Trace: b17f11247b2ac8f0a79dc4b33984cbaa0a9da525759e2654481aa5c7a5207c08df25df1611ed54e6133ed92d71017c35350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 68.40.94.44 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006F_01C7506A.D31199D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I only used AN4's ends on my DH lines because I already had a supply of AN4/NPT fittings. Perhaps someone else has greater insight. Seems AN3's would be a bit lighter. _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Skip Slater Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:43 PM To: lml Subject: [LML] Re: SS Braided brake lines This is the same type of line (different manufacturer) that I recently retrofit in my ES. Several other builders I know used this type of line as well. I used AN-3 fittings on my lines, which are perfectly adequate. Perhaps someone out there can explain if there's a benefit to the AN-4's that seem to be the preference of those ordering new lines from DH. Skip Slater N540ES ------=_NextPart_000_006F_01C7506A.D31199D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I only used AN4’s ends on my = DH lines because I already had a supply of AN4/NPT fittings.  Perhaps = someone else has greater insight. Seems AN3’s would be a bit = lighter.

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Skip Slater
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:43 PM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: SS Braided brake = lines

 

This is the same type of line (different manufacturer) that I recently retrofit in my ES.  Several = other builders I know used this type of line as well.  I used AN-3 = fittings on my lines, which are perfectly adequate.  Perhaps someone out there = can explain if there's a benefit to the AN-4's that seem to be the = preference of those ordering new lines from DH.

 

Skip = Slater

N540ES

------=_NextPart_000_006F_01C7506A.D31199D0--