X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 46 [XX] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:25:24 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-05.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1838107 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:07:44 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.104; envelope-from=sreeves@sc.rr.com Received: from sreeves10.sc.rr.com (cpe-065-184-125-203.sc.res.rr.com [65.184.125.203]) by ms-smtp-05.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1EL6PVS021821 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:06:25 -0500 (EST) X-Original-Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.0.20070214160441.0426b0d0@sc.rr.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:06:24 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List From: "S. Reeves" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Night vision goggles In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_194119718==.ALT" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine --=====================_194119718==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed So I could use an O2 tank minus the regulator for propulsion to my destination? Would that meet the requirements for airworthiness? Steve >O2 is cheaper. > >Grayhawk --=====================_194119718==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" So I could use an O2 tank minus the regulator for propulsion to my destination? Would that meet the requirements for airworthiness?

Steve

O2 is cheaper.

Grayhawk

--=====================_194119718==.ALT--