X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:25:03 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.94] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with SMTP id 1838096 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:03:22 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.229.94; envelope-from=earleschroeder@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 52019 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2007 21:02:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=A6EvWbTmLgvW3VZ5M5dqFvQkH2B5dMVY7c83amojd6kqj1QcjB8sFnH1Yeffc9NJw/6CGRjr99S3gcs10flWwVZT0HPWuRXeOzQDsZqVqXLT+BfNPmHhLx7v5dcE43R2Dm9OVTRdktU3dEF65FkakvUQ79295pSIw1korNfmtXM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.108?) (earleschroeder@75.16.249.104 with plain) by smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2007 21:02:18 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ELvGTKIVM1n9D9cQopFtZGmIdlBNYchTD7J28pltm.cea3Px0v6VTZ.OW_F7dNh7371KbTIf_0wCVAzajiKLYClVSrjdLZ9g0qQoNtdsqgxQCpGmuS3OXWPl_Drf0VCFXE9HdLZufQZeoQc- X-Original-Message-ID: <45D378D4.1010006@yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:02:12 -0600 From: Earl Schroeder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] DH Lines References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Angier [and others interested] In the interest of safety [mine and others] I have as much passion about not using Swagelok in Lancair brake lines as Brent has about not using plastic. In my job at GE Plastics [before retirement - 31 yrs] I installed thousands of compression tube fittings from various manufactures. Swagelok is the MOST likely to fail from improper installation of all the others. [tylok, nupro, gyrolok, etc] Note the small ferrule in the picture where it joins the larger one. If overtightened initially or in subsequent remakes, it will cut into the tubing and eventually the tubing will fail. Any vibration will make it fail quicker. Swagelok is great for lab gas systems etc but NOT for aircraft. You can make certain that YOU installed it according to the directions [six flats - no more] but will the next person know the rules or will you forget and just give it a bit more to make sure it doesn't leak? There is NO discernible increase in torque when it is 'tight' enough. Tylok can be tightened until it 'squeaks' and it will not cut the tubing. The others are less likely to cut but will if severely overtightened. Unfortunately, tylok is the most likely to leak. Hmmm, what to do? I would use flared and support the line close to the fitting. Remember, as Brent says, I may not know anything... use at your own risk. Earl Greenbacks, UnLtd. wrote: > Here are several pics of 24" DH line. The two fittings on the right > were swaged at the factory. Those on the other end are designed to > accept compression fittings, in this case from Swagelok. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Typical Swagelok compression fitting... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Not the cheapest way to go, but just think of that tinker-toy > nylaflow line, installed in the last century, turning yellow and > getting more brittle by the hour... > Getting ready to burst at the worst possible time... > > Angier Ames >