X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:29:18 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1837811 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:53:58 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.6; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.d3d.248b9b8 (40521) for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:52:56 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:52:55 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Night vision goggles X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1171479175" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5358 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1171479175 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/14/2007 12:41:40 P.M. Central Standard Time, sreeves@sc.rr.com writes: What do you guys think about night vision goggles for added safety factor for single engine night flying. I'm talking about for the unfortunate event of engine failure, not tooling around wearing them ;). The prices on them have been reduced over the years, and it would be cheaper than buying a twin. Any thoughts? O2 is cheaper. Grayhawk -------------------------------1171479175 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 2/14/2007 12:41:40 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 sreeves@sc.rr.com writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>What do=20 you guys think about night vision goggles for added safety
factor for=20 single engine night flying. I'm talking about for the
unfortunat= e=20 event of engine failure, not tooling around wearing them
;). The= =20 prices on them have been reduced over the years, and it
would be cheap= er=20 than buying a twin. Any thoughts?

O2 is cheaper.

Grayhawk

-------------------------------1171479175--