X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:42:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1837781 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:33:52 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.70; envelope-from=skipslater@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=UtJCzJImgwo7ukoGevjCljhOQ9h9m2/ys5XjHOUAE10lnyUFSWNAnXnBPx08z9em; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.116.174.57] (helo=wbs) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HHOwB-0001OW-2J for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:33:03 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <001401c75066$d3f34410$6601a8c0@wbs> From: "Skip Slater" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] SS Braided brake lines X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:34:53 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0011_01C75023.C315C610" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-ELNK-Trace: cbee950bdf563876c8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c2609a2f7131e4a9c02533c3294edf365a6f0350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.174.57 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C75023.C315C610 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is the same type of line (different manufacturer) that I recently = retrofit in my ES. Several other builders I know used this type of line = as well. I used AN-3 fittings on my lines, which are perfectly = adequate. Perhaps someone out there can explain if there's a benefit to = the AN-4's that seem to be the preference of those ordering new lines = from DH. Skip Slater N540ES ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C75023.C315C610 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is the same type of line = (different=20 manufacturer) that I recently retrofit in my ES.  Several = other=20 builders I know used this type of line as well.  I used AN-3 = fittings on my=20 lines, which are perfectly adequate.  Perhaps someone out there can = explain=20 if there's a benefit to the AN-4's that seem to be the preference of = those=20 ordering new lines from DH.
 
Skip Slater
N540ES
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C75023.C315C610--