From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Collaborating on checklists
To: lml
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:20:00 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1835457@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <7141427652BB3049A7DBF1084B67805B0F7CC9@penumbra.arilabs.net>
References: <7141427652BB3049A7DBF1084B67805B0F7CC9@penumbra.arilabs.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Kevin Stallard" <Kevin@arilabs.net>:

  Kevin,
  
  "Kevin, I see in the past you have looked to the LML for some answers
  and consensus on a few items?
  
  I think you are underestimating the knowledge and the decades of
  experience of the many people that read and post to the LML."
  
  
  Kev,
  
  I'm not talking about troubleshooting a few problems with an airplane.
  I'm talking about collaborating with someone less than expert to come up
  with an important document.  This is an extreme example, but to me it's
  like putting a bunch of monkeys in a room and expect them to come up
  with the works of Shakespeare.  I mean really, we're just a bunch of
  pilots.  We aren't necessarily experts.  Be careful with what you think
  you know, that's all I'm saying.
  
  My whole premise is that group think isn't necessarily the right think.
  Good luck with the checklists, I hope it works out for you.
  
  Kevin,
  L2K-291