X-SpamCatcher-Score:   1 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.3)
  with HTTP id 1664512 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:59:35 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Lancair IV static port question
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.3
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:59:35 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1664512@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <00b801c71ce1$b441f7f0$c211140a@fred>
References: <00b801c71ce1$b441f7f0$c211140a@fred>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="windows-1250";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Fred Moreno" <fredmoreno@optusnet.com.au>:

  What is the current prevailing opinion about the “best” location for the
  static port?  By “best” I mean that yielding the smallest installation error
  at cruise speeds.  I plan to use angle of attack for guidance at lower
  speeds.
  
  Many thanks,
  
Fred Moreno
  
  90% done, 40% to go?