Return-Path: Received: from onyx.xtalwind.net ([205.160.242.2]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 6 Nov 1999 10:02:29 -0500 Received: from jandb (xtal268.xtalwind.net [205.245.61.189]) by onyx.xtalwind.net (8.9.3/8.9.2) with SMTP id KAA49571 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 1999 10:06:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3824467E.3B16@xtalwind.net> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 10:17:18 -0500 From: Judy Reply-To: jandb@xtalwind.net To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Flaps Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I was under the impression that the 320 model no longer used the reflexed flaps and was not planning on having a reflex position. I did read some of the thread about wing twisting and decided it was just as well not to have reflex in my flaps. Is there an advantage to reflexing the flaps in the 320 model? I thought in some of the very old factory News Bulletins that Lance had announced No noticeable change in air speed with reflex flaps. Did I miss something else? Bobby >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>