X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:25:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp104.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.5) with SMTP id 1443631 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:15:05 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.229.101; envelope-from=lorn@dynacomm.ws Received: (qmail 26091 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2006 16:14:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (lorn@ameritech.net@69.209.167.18 with plain) by smtp104.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2006 16:14:43 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: <4F82CC7D-366B-48F6-8B0F-0D48880FDF84@dynacomm.ws> X-Original-Cc: "Emmanuel Vargas" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Lorn H Olsen Subject: Re: Lancair 235/290 Purchase X-Original-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:14:42 -0400 X-Original-To: Lancair List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) > From: "Emmanuel Vargas" > > Hello Everyone, > > I=92m thinking about getting a Lancair 235/290-D2. Would someone =20 > answer these questions? > > 1. What will be the Pro=92s and Con=92s of getting an aircraft like = =20 > this? CONS: You have to learn how to fly the airplane into a landing. Full stall =20 landings in the small Lancairs result in new props. I had 1,500 hours =20= when I purchased my Lancair 320 in 1998. I must have had really bad =20 landing habits. It took me 700 hours to learn to grease the plane on =20 every time. I now have 1,200 hours in the Lancair and can finally =20 land it. PROS: There is no faster or more economical way to travel. I fly from =20 Detroit to Jacksonville, Fl in 4 hours and use 30 gallons of fuel. I =20 can't do that in the best car. The Lancair is not the plane to be =20 boppin around locally in. If you have a cross country need, this is =20 the plane. I have standard 43 gl tanks and can and have flown over =20 1,000 mile legs on many occasions. Here is my plane: http://www.michusa.com/lorn/ > 2. Would you give me an educated opinion about the Plane and =20 > engine combination? I like the O-320 better but the 290 is a good 2nd choice and should =20 cost less. It is a little smaller on the inside than the 320 or 360. > 3. Would you give me some advice, recommendation, suggestion, =20 > warning about this type of aircraft? 1.) Pay attention when landing. 2.) Buy a Garmin 396 or 496 with weather. This plane covers so much =20 ground that there will always be some weather problem on your route. 3.) Get a good instructor. > 4. What will be the approximately annual operation cost? I do my own maintenance except for the annual condition inspection =20 which cost me $250 this year. I keep very detailed records. I fly the =20= plane 120 hours per year. My annual costs are $12,000. These costs =20 include a hanger for $175/month and insurance of $2,161 for the =20 aircraft value of $70,000. > I have never flown a Lancair before. I fell in love when I saw the =20 > local Lancair Club, flying in formation over Big Bear Lake here =20 > California. I can understand that. Call Lancair and see if they can recommend =20 someone to instruct you in learning to fly the Lancair correctly. http://www.lancair.com/Main/contact.html > Thanks, > Manny > Temecula, CA Manny, Feel free to call at any time to talk about the Lancairs. Sincerely, Lorn H Olsen -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, Corp. 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws LNC2, O-320-D1F, 1,200 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan