X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:35:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from outbound-mail.lax.untd.com ([64.136.28.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.4) with SMTP id 1412238 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:25:53 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.28.164; envelope-from=jkezele@juno.com Received: from webmail20.lax.untd.com (webmail20.lax.untd.com [10.131.27.160]) by smtpout08.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABCTDNPQAT3P9SS for (sender ); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:25:02 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: 9OvJUXd2tUqhLb258iQtPbchJodA5MKD8/Dd2SAkg6Eau6CnEe6IwA== Received: (from jkezele@juno.com) by webmail20.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id L2Q8VPJM; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:24:02 PDT Received: from [12.174.32.2] by webmail20.lax.untd.com with HTTP: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:23:05 GMT X-Originating-IP: [12.174.32.2] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "jkezele@juno.com" X-Original-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:23:05 GMT X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Closing out the Rudder and Capstrips Small Dam's? X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain X-Original-Message-Id: <20060920.142402.741.693825@webmail20.lax.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 3:4:569729511 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.131.27.160|webmail20.lax.untd.com|webmail20.lax.untd.com|jkezele@juno.com Scott, Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. I am certainly = interested in keeping the weight down, especially aft of the CG. You = mentioned forming a "small dam" to help reduce the chance of migration = of the epoxy/flox on closing. I do not know how to do this weight = saving technique. Regards, John Kezele Preston Idaho