X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:21:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [204.13.112.9] (HELO exchange.corp.hometel.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.4) with ESMTP id 1400839 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:19:49 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.13.112.9; envelope-from=marknlisa@hometel.com Received: from Main ([204.13.118.2]) by exchange.corp.hometel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:19:08 -0500 From: "Mark Sletten" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: High Altitude Oxygen Failure X-Original-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:19:08 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <014a01c6d72e$d0332cc0$6501a8c0@Main> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 thread-index: AcbXHeHcToYT6dQ4SxSxBg2iGZZzgAACxaig In-Reply-To: X-Original-Return-Path: marknlisa@hometel.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Sep 2006 12:19:08.0186 (UTC) FILETIME=[CFD3A7A0:01C6D72E] Some of you guys picked up on my comment that the FAA requires a "positive pressure" mask above 18K... One person may be > fine with a cannula up to 35,000ft; another might not make it much > past 18,000ft -- the altitude at which the FAA requires one to wear a > mask providing positive pressure. Mr. Simon pointed out that the masks usually found in light aircraft don't seal and don't provide positive pressure. You guys are right, I misspoke. The masks DON'T provide positive pressure because they don't seal. But, they do ensure the MIXTURE you're breathing contains a higher percentage of oxygen than would be provided by a cannula. The regulator is constantly pushing oxygen into the mask and the bag attached forcing ambient air out, so at least the volume of the mask and bag is 100% oxygen. 100% oxygen will delay the point at which the dropping pressure results in hypoxia, but eventually you WILL reach an altitude where the ambient pressure no longer forces a gas exchange in the lungs. Not even 100% oxygen will help at that point. So at what altitude does the reduced efficiency of the gas exchange result in dangerously low blood oxygen? Again, everyone is different. If you climb mountains regularly or live in Breckenridge, CO (around 12K MSL IIRC) you may not need ANY supplemental oxygen until well above 18K. If you're a little older and a little out of shape -- with the resultant loss in aerobic efficiency -- you may want to give yourself every chance you can to remain conscious. The bottom line in my book -- the mask is necessary above 18K, eschew its use only if you have a good reason and know why you're doing so. If you plan to fly regularly above 18K with only a cannula I highly recommend the use of an oximeter on EVERY flight. Don't use it one time and think you have it licked. Blood/oxygen efficiency is affected by MANY factors and may be very different from one flight to the next. Again, sorry for the misstep. Mark Sletten