X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:32:00 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [70.62.14.124] (HELO server1.USTEK) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1374160 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:17:13 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=rsimon@ustek.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [LML] Re: AW: MT-Propeller Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:17:55 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: AW: MT-Propeller Thread-Index: AcbVsr0QOlQ2fgTeToq8orBP4vcYMQAAPmeQ From: "Lancair" X-Original-Sender: "Robert Simon" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Martin, OUCH!=20 That seems a bit of over reaction. Scott is commenting about a lack of communication and not calling into question the integrity of your product or company. We all know there are many Lancairs flying with the MT props, and as you mentioned they are fine products and none are falling out of the sky. Scott is testing the performance envelope and that result could add to your already large wealth of knowledge. And coming across the finish line in first place always makes for good press.=20 =20 Robert M. Simon ES-P N301ES (and I really love my MT prop - I do, I do!)=20 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Marvin Kaye Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 10:57 AM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: AW: MT-Propeller Posted for Martin Albrecht : Dear Marv, =20 please be so nice and show the e-mail below. =20 Thanks a lot for your help. =20 With best regards, =20 MT - Propeller Entwicklung GmbH =20 =20 Martin Albrecht Engineering =20 =20 -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: Martin Albrecht [SMTP:Martin.Albrecht@mt-propeller.com] Gesendet am: Montag, 11. September 2006 09:05 An: 'warbirdaeropress@cox.net' Cc: Erik Bollen [erik_bollen@thielert.com] (E-Mail) Betreff: MT-Propeller =20 =20 Dear Scott, =20 with great interest we have read the news from the Lancair mailing list and it is always perfect to use the internet t o spread information before asking the manufacturer. =20 As we are fully aware at MT-Propeller that you are definitely not interested in our product, we can accept and therefore the propeller which arrives today at Superior in Texas is not approved for racing on the XP400 - engine. The propeller which arrives today is full property of MT-Propeller as it was never paid and therefore we have the possibilities to ground this propeller. This propeller must be sent back to MT-Propeller USA and is not approved for racing this year. =20 MT-Propeller is definitely not interested in such negative publicity and if somebody is so negative on our product there is no need that somebody like you is using our product. =20 We wish you all the best with the Hartzell propeller. =20 Just keep in mind that MT-Propeller is the only manufacturer in the world which has accumulated 100 million flying hours with no in-flight accident and no active AD in the last 10 years. =20 With best regards, =20 MT - Propeller Entwicklung GmbH =20 Martin Albrecht Engineering =20