Return-Path: Received: from dskfw1.funb.com ([168.175.254.61]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:05:13 -0400 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dskfw1.funb.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA22255 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:09:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clt-msw-02.funb.com(168.175.76.95) by dskfw1.funb.com via smap (V2.0) id xma022199; Thu, 28 Oct 99 19:08:58 -0400 Received: from clt-conn-04.capmark.funb.com (unverified) by clt-msw-02.capmark.funb.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:05:12 -0400 Received: by clt-conn-04.capmark.funb.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:08:50 -0400 Message-Id: From: "Hapgood, Matt" To: "'Harry League'" , Richard L Perry , lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: RE: L IV P LPE - engines Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:08:57 -0400 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Darus' explanation to me on the speed issue was a long time ago, but the basic idea was that you could reduce the frontal area due to more efficient cooling. This gains speed. In addition, the engine's specific fuel consumption decreases. So if targeting a fuel burn, more horsepower would be generated for the same gallons per hour, resulting is higher cruise speeds. Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair