Return-Path: Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 12:38:07 -0400 Received: from BLBISBEE@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v23.6.) id kXXT08WHoD (4205) for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 12:41:47 -0400 (EDT) From: BLBISBEE@aol.com Message-ID: <0.c153aced.2548854b@aol.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 12:41:47 EDT Subject: Lightning protection, speed brakes and larger fuel tanks on ES To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I was reading a pilot report on the Katana airplane and they mentioned it was not certified for IFR because it wasn't lightning certified. I am soon to start the wings on my ES and I was wondering if this issue applied to our kind of airplanes. That is are we exempt from anything to do with lightning certification? I know many of you have flown your planes IFR and I intend to as necessary. Do static wicks help in this reguard? Has anyone looked into this? I know from experience on the big iron that lightning doesn't like fiberglass,( punches fairly large holes in radomes, but only puts pin sized holes in aluminum) ,and static discharges can occur far from convective wx. On another subject I am thinking about purchasing speedbrakes and would like to have the larger(90 gal) fuel system. Is there any space or fitting problems with this configuration? Thanks Bob Bisbee (BIZ) ES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html