|
|
terrence o'neill wrote:
The intent was to say that the airlines are not much safer than GenAv in spite of the fact that they have all these extra benefits: compete FAA congtrol of movement, latest technology, maxim um training, excellent experience ... as compared to the week-end Airknocker pilot.
Terrence,
I believe you have a fundamental disconnect with reality if you believe that part 121 flying is not much safer than the part 91 flying. The accident data shows the difference to be more than an order of magnitude.
Let me change the topic here for a second. I have not had a chance to look through the archives to review everything that you have written, but I do not recall pegging you as blatantly out of touch with reality. However, recently you have come across as a tin foil hat wearing, black helicopter fearing, government microchip implanted in the butt kind of militia man from around here in the back woods of Idaho. Your spelling and grammar have gone to hell, not to mention the logical content of your e-mails. The spelling and grammar are deteriorating with each e-mail as is your grasp of reality. Terrence this is a serious suggestion, not a rhetorical one: Go and get yourself checked out medically. There are a number of medical conditions where the first symptom is a change in cognitive state. Usually the change happens at a much slower pace (months and years) for chronic conditions and at a much faster pace (over a matter of minutes or hours) for acute conditions, but what we are seeing from you is still troublesome. Please do yourself and those that care about you a great favor and go see a doctor. And please do all pilots a favor and ground yourself till you get a medical clearance -- there is clearly something going on that needs evaluation.
Regards,
Hamid
|
|