Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:34:14 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1136920@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.192.64.50; envelope-from=dtaylor@crescentpark.com
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [LML] Re: Another Lean of Peak question
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Another Lean of Peak question
Thread-Index: AcaFFKCWwjEK9PsNR7Gzz2gsRl4P+QAgAcYg
From: "Taylor, David" <dtaylor@crescentpark.com>

Walter:

Thanks for the response. =20

Do you have any opinion on how much of bear the IO-540-V4A5 used in the
Legacy is to balance?

David T.


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Atkinson
Sent: 05-31-2006 Wed 20:45
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Another Lean of Peak question

David:

**I know the new and rebuilt 550's in Legacys run pretty well LOP --
even without GAMI injectors.

Do the rebuilt 540's do this also???  Or do you need GAMI injectors to
run them LOP?**

The 540s are not as well balanced without GAMIjectors as the 550G.  As a
matter of fact, some of them are a real bear to balance.


**Do 540's run just as efficiently LOP (ie same SFC) as 550's???**


The TIO-540 and TSIO-550 have very nearly the same CR.  They have very=20
nearly the same BSFC(min), so the answer is "yes, they're pretty close=20
in efficiency."

Walter


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/