X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:58:49 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1133799@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <flycassutts@yahoo.com>
Received: from web33713.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.201.210] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with SMTP id 1133180 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 May 2006 12:28:22 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.201.210; envelope-from=flycassutts@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 64096 invoked by uid 60001); 30 May 2006 16:27:37 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=3banaIEjvdfjt0J6lvqwQCzfDVq54zqiwb0E/Cw/Xb+xxEml3AukcPXQCq2wk5fqHG95mE8vwotgk+1BUc0rZVFHv23366NtW8niLR2WlQgB/pKDGPPHngq0b5PkYNlvpOmlJbIyf6f4cQjwkR2BsHbzU3g9cGF2kGUPl7f6gQI=  ;
X-Original-Message-ID: <20060530162737.64094.qmail@web33713.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [63.225.20.60] by web33713.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:27:37 PDT
X-Original-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Art Jensen <flycassutts@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Lean of Peak question
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-1132795@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

John,

Also of note is that Continental Motors now makes
injectors designed for the same purpose as
Gami-injectors, that is for LOP operation.

 Then came Gamijectors and a huge
> split of opinion as to whether lean of peak
> operation (now feasible) was advisable.  The debate
> continues with tradition (it seems) on one side and
> the numbers on the other.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com