X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 16:42:31 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1131612 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 29 May 2006 08:46:37 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=cblitzer@triad.rr.com Received: from YOUR85A8F7B8EC (cpe-065-190-066-055.triad.res.rr.com [65.190.66.55]) by ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4TCjnRm028673 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 08:45:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <001601c6831d$cfc21090$1102a8c0@YOUR85A8F7B8EC> From: "cblitzer" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Vern Pifer X-Original-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:45:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01C682FC.485F4350" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C682FC.485F4350 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ian, Sorry for the misuinderstanding But vern is not back at lancair. He and I touch base on occassion, (not often enough) and I had discussed = this topic with him along with Bob, Jeff and Ed. Craig ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ian B. Crowe=20 To: Lancair Mailing List=20 Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 12:38 AM Subject: [LML] Vern Pifer In Craig's Blitzer's E mail of the 27th May he says "According to Vern = from Lancair" For one wild moment I allowed myself to think that maybe Vern had = returned. I heard that his stint inthe militiary did not last too long. = I suppose that Craig was referring to communication with Vern before he = left Lancair for the militiary. Craig, can you shed any light as to whether Vern is back on board? Ian Crowe Brent Reagan, if you wrote for Flying I would buy the mag just for = your articles, I loved your E mail entitled safety. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C682FC.485F4350 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ian,
Sorry for the misuinderstanding But = vern is not=20 back at lancair.
He and I touch base on occassion, (not = often=20 enough) and I had discussed this topic with him along with Bob, Jeff and = Ed.
Craig
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ian B.=20 Crowe
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 = 12:38 AM
Subject: [LML] Vern Pifer

In Craig's Blitzer's E mail of the 27th May he = says=20 "According to Vern from Lancair"
 
For one wild moment I allowed myself to think that = maybe=20 Vern had returned.  I heard that his stint inthe militiary did = not last=20 too long.  I suppose that Craig was referring to communication = with Vern=20 before he left Lancair for the militiary.
 
Craig, can you shed any light as to whether Vern = is back on=20 board?
 
Ian Crowe
 
 
Brent Reagan, if you wrote for Flying I would buy = the mag=20 just for your articles, I loved your E mail entitled=20 safety.
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C682FC.485F4350--